Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Leon Hennequin et al., Appellants, v. Henry Clews et al., Respondents, 1881 — 84 N.Y. 676 · caselaw · US
General
Leon Hennequin et al., Appellants, v. Henry Clews et al., Respondents
84 N.Y. 676·New York Court of Appeals·1881·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Leon Hennequin et al., Appellants, v. Henry Clews et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 16,1881;
decided March 25,1881.)
C. Bainbridge Smith for appellants.
J. M. Guiteau for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on authority of decision on former appeal (77 N. Y. 427).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.