General
Grove D. Curtis et al., Respondents, v. Natalie Anthracite Coal Company, Appellant
181 N.Y. 543·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Grove D. Curtis et al., Respondents, v. Natalie Anthracite Coal Company, Appellant.
Curtis v. Natalie Anthracite Coal Co., 89 App. Div. 61, affirmed.
(Argued March 17, 1905;
decided April 11, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 11, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Martin Conboy, Arthur J. Baldwin and Leonard D. Baldwin for appellant.
George O. Austin for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below.
Concur: O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Oh. J. Absent: Gray, J.