Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Louisiana et al., 1966 — 384 U.S. 936 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Louisiana et al.
384 U.S. 936·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May 16, 1966.
No. 9,
Original.
United States v. Louisiana et al.
Solicitor General Marshall, Archibald Cox, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, Louis F. Claiborne and George S. Swarth for the United States. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, John L. Madden, Assistant Attorney General, and Paul M. Hebert, Victor A. Sachse, Thomas W. Leigh, J. B. Miller, Oliver P. Stockiuell, J. J. Davidson and Frederick W. Ellis, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, for the State of Louisiana. [Supplemental Decree reported at 382 U. S. 288.]
[MAJORITY]
Motion of the United States for leave to file an amended account pursuant to the supplemental decree granted. Motion for leave to file corrections to the accounting filed by the State of Louisiana on February 25, 1966, granted.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.