Contracts · MBE-tested
NASH BREYER MOTOR COMPANY, formerly Troy Motor Sales Company, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
61 F.2d 1036·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NASH BREYER MOTOR COMPANY, formerly Troy Motor Sales Company, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 6241.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 8, 1932.
See, also, 44 F.(2d) 376.
Geo. G. Witter and M. F. Mitchell, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
• G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Se-wall Key and Morton K. Rothschild, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., and Alva C. Baird, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for respondent.
Before MACK, Circuit Judge, and KER-RIGAN and ST. SURE, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of motion of petitioner for leave to amend petition to review and upon motion of respondent to dismiss cause for failure of petitioner to file petition to review within six months after decision of Board of Tax Appeals, and for failure to print record and file brief as required by Rules of Practice of this Court, ordered motion to dismiss granted; and petition to review dismissed.