Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MELENDIA v. PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, 1928 — 29 F.2d 741 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
MELENDIA v. PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
29 F.2d 741·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MELENDIA v. PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
December 10, 1928.
No. 3952.
D. H. Jackson, of Christiansted, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, for appellant.
J. C. Fox, of Christiansted, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, for the People of the Virgin Islands.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Property feloniously taken from the owner’s house was found in the personal possession of the accused.' As he made an unsatisfactory explanation of how he had acquired it, we find that the rule of evidence in larceny cases in respect to property recently stolen and found in the possession of one other than the owner was not improperly applied. 17 R. C. L. 71-74.
The judgment is affirmed.