Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The City of Yonkers, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
General
The City of Yonkers, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
159 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The City of Yonkers, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Reported below, 32 App. Div. 474.
(Submitted June 19, 1899;
decided June 23, 1899.)
Motion to prefer an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department in favor of plaintiff, entered October 18, 1898, upon a submission of - a controversy under section 1279, Code of Civil Procedure.
The motion was made upon the ground that the questions involved are of public importance and the appeal should be speedily heard.
Frank Loomis for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, without costs.