Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The United States ex rel. Sali Zimmerspitz, Appellant, v. P. L. Prentis et al., 1913 — 229 U.S. 604 · caselaw · US
General
The United States ex rel. Sali Zimmerspitz, Appellant, v. P. L. Prentis et al.
229 U.S. 604·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 911.
The United States ex rel. Sali Zimmerspitz, Appellant, v. P. L. Prentis et al.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Submitted April 11, 1913.
Decided April 28, 1913.
Mr. Benjamin C. Bachrach for the appellant.
The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Harr for. the appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Lampasas v. Bell, 180 U. S. 276, 282; American Sugar Refining Co. v. United States, 211 U. S. 155, 161.