Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Rowe, Respondent, v. Salmon E. Stevens, Appellant, 1873 — 53 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
General
James Rowe, Respondent, v. Salmon E. Stevens, Appellant
53 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Rowe, Respondent, v. Salmon E. Stevens, Appellant.
(Argued May 30, 1873;
decided June 10, 1873.)
Where in. a negotiation for the_exchange of real estate a broker is employed by both parties, with notice that he is acting in the matter for the other, and with such notice each agrees to pay him his commissions, he can recover them of both.
This action was brought to recover commissions alleged to have been earned by plaintiff, as real estate broker, in effecting an exchange of certain premises owned by defendant for certain premises owned by another. The evidence tended to show that both parties placed their property in his hands, and both had notice that he was employed by the other, and with such knowledge each agreed to pay him his commissions. Plaintiff brought the parties together, and through his aid an exchange was effected. At the close of the evidence defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, upon the ground that a broker could not take a commission from both parties, which motion was denied. Held, no error; that if defendant employed plaintiff and agreed to pay the commission, with notice that he was also employed and was to be paid by the other party, the agreement could be enforced.
Ira D. Warren for the appellant.
C. Shafer for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Folger, J.,]
Folger, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.