Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. Barnes and William Clark, Appellees, v. Steam Tug HERCULES, etc.; Cornell Steamboat Company, Appellant, 1928 — 26 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
William H. Barnes and William Clark, Appellees, v. Steam Tug HERCULES, etc.; Cornell Steamboat Company, Appellant
26 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1928
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Barnes and William Clark, Appellees, v. Steam Tug HERCULES, etc.; Cornell Steamboat Company, Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 4, 1928.
No. 296.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Robert S. Erskine, Henry P. Elliott and Kirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, all of New York City, for appellant.
Courtland Palmer and Hayes & Palmer, all of New York City, for appellees.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.