Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Exxon Corp. et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency; Texas Chemical Council v. Environmental Protection Agency; and Harris County et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 1975 — 421 U.S. 945 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Exxon Corp. et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency; Texas Chemical Council v. Environmental Protection Agency; and Harris County et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency
421 U.S. 945·United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-863.
No. A-864.
No. A-875.
Exxon Corp. et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency; Texas Chemical Council v. Environmental Protection Agency; and Harris County et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency.
[MAJORITY]
Applications for stay of mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
See also note, supra, p. 940.