Tax

ADERHOLD, Warden, v. ENGLAND

73 F.2d 91·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1934

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

ADERHOLD, Warden, v. ENGLAND. No. 7513. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Oct. 16, 1934. See, also, (C. C. A.) 67 F.(2d) 248. Lawrence S. Camp, U. S. Atty., H. T. Nichols, Sp. Atty., and Ike K. Hay, Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant. Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. By this appeal the warden of the Atlanta Penitentiary contends that the district judge erred in computing deductions from a second sentence imposed upon appellee, a prisoner in the penitentiary. The facts upon which the District Court acted are not shown by the petition, or by any evidence in the record. It follows that the judgment must be, and it is, affirmed.