Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Vicente RUIZ-SALAZAR and Juanita Almanza De Ruiz, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent, 1975 — 515 F.2d 619 · caselaw · US
General
Vicente RUIZ-SALAZAR and Juanita Almanza De Ruiz, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
515 F.2d 619·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1975
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and AINSWORTH and DYER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Vicente RUIZ-SALAZAR and Juanita Almanza De Ruiz, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 74-1489.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 7, 1975.
Joseph J. Rey, Jr., El Paso, Tex., for petitioners.
William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Frank D. McCown, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., Rex Young, John L. Murphy, Attys., Gov. Regulations See., Crim. Div., Washington, D. C., District Director, U. S. Dept, of Justice, I. N. S., Dallas, Tex., Troy A. Adams, Jr., Dist. Dir., I. N. S., New Orleans, La.
[REHEARING — PER CURIAM:]
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion Dec. 13, 1974, 5 Cir., 1974, 505 F.2d 118.)
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and AINSWORTH and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Deportation of this alien was sought under § 241(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251(a)(1), for excludability on the basis of § 212(a)(20), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1182(a)(20). We held that the forgiveness provision, § 241(f), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251(f), was available and reversed the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
As done today in Castro-Guerrero v. INS, on the basis of Reid v. INS, 1975, - U.S. -, 95 S.Ct. 1164, 43 L.Ed. 501, we grant rehearing to affirm the order of the Board.
Affirmed.
. Ruiz-Salazar v. INS, 5 Cir., 1974, 505 F.2d 118.