Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Michael Madden, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1872 — 47 N.Y. 665 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Michael Madden, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
47 N.Y. 665·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Madden, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued January 19th, 1872;
decided February 6th, 1872.)
Plaintiee’s intestate was killed by the cars when attempting to cross defendant’s track upon a public highway. Defendant’s counsel asked the court to charge, “that if the jury believed that the deceased, before she reached the track, saw the train approaching, and notwithstanding this went upon the track, where she was hit by the car, she was chargeable with negligence and could not recover.” The court refused so to charge. Held, error.
Samuel Hand for appellant.
A. J. Parker for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Peckham, J.,]
Peckham, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial .
All concur. Judgment reversed.