Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New Jersey & New York Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey et al., 1953 — 346 U.S. 868 · caselaw · US
General
New Jersey & New York Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey et al.
346 U.S. 868·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 308.
New Jersey & New York Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey et al.
Richard Swan Buell and Justin W. Seymour for appellant. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey, John R. Sailer, Deputy Attorney General, and Frank H. Sommer for the Board of Public Utility Commissioners; and Sam A. Colarusso for the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.