Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Walter L. Livingston, as Appointee, etc., Respondent, v. William Slocum, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1879 — 77 N.Y. 620 · caselaw · US
General
Walter L. Livingston, as Appointee, etc., Respondent, v. William Slocum, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
77 N.Y. 620·New York Court of Appeals·1879·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Walter L. Livingston, as Appointee, etc., Respondent, v. William Slocum, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued April 22, 1879;
decided May 20, 1879.)
Samuel Hand for appellant.
• William E. French for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
opinion for modification, by deducting $445 interest from the judgment for deficiency, and by striking out costs of appeal to General Term and as modified, affirmed.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.