Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dorsey et al. v. Stuyvesant Town Corporation et al., 1950 — 339 U.S. 981 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Dorsey et al. v. Stuyvesant Town Corporation et al.
339 U.S. 981·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 402.
Dorsey et al. v. Stuyvesant Town Corporation et al.
Court of Appeals of New York.
Will Maslow, Charles Abrams, Thurgood Marshall, Shad Polier and Joseph B. Robison for petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.
Churchill Rodgers, Samuel Seabury, C. Frank Reavis, Jeremiah M. Evarts and George Trosk for respondents.