Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Emma Keller et al., Respondents, v. Henry Feldman, Appellant, 1894 — 144 N.Y. 633 · caselaw · US
General
Emma Keller et al., Respondents, v. Henry Feldman, Appellant
144 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emma Keller et al., Respondents, v. Henry Feldman, Appellant.
(Argued October 25, 1894;
decided November 27, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made June 30, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
John Henry Hull for appellant.
George F. Langhei/n for respondents.
Reported below, 70 Hun, 377.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur..
Judgment affirmed.