IP
MOORE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWCOMB MOTOR COMPANY
216 U.S. 608·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MOORE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWCOMB MOTOR COMPANY.
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF, COLUMBIA.
No. 115.
Argued March 1, 2, 1910.
Decided March 7, 1910.
A writ of error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia dismissed for want df jurisdiction without opinion on the authority of Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1, and other cases cited.
Writ of error to review 33 App. D. C. 597, dismissed.
Mr. Frederick P. Fish and Mr. Melville Church, with whom Mr.'Albert G. -Davis was on the briéf,'for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Robert N. Kenyon, with whom Mr. Walter F. Rogers and Mr. Charles H.- Duell were on the brief, for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The writ of error is dismissed for want of •jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1; Rousseau v. Browne, 21 App. D. C. 73, 80; Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U. S. 284; Atkins v. Moore, 212 U. S. 285; Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U. S. 561; Same v. Same, 27 App. D. C. 530, 532; Taylor v. Taft, 203 U. S. 461; United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280; Baltimore & Potomac R. R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210, 226. The application for certiorari is also denied.