Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bartholomew Lynch et al., Appellants, v. De Witt Gardner et al., Respondents, 1877 — 69 N.Y. 624 · caselaw · US
Administrative
Bartholomew Lynch et al., Appellants, v. De Witt Gardner et al., Respondents
69 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bartholomew Lynch et al., Appellants, v. De Witt Gardner et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 13, 1877 ;
decided May 22, 1877.)
J. A. Hathway, for appellants.
Albertus Perry, for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Miller, J.,]
Allen, Rapadlo, Andrews and Earl, JJ., concur for affirmance of order granting new trial, and for judgment absolute on stipulation.
Miller, J.,
reads opinion for reversal of order granting new trial and affirming judgment. Church, Ch. J., does not vote. Folger, J., absent.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.