Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Blanche T. Holland, Respondent, v. Fred A. Reed et al., Appellants, 1908 — 191 N.Y. 543 · caselaw · US
General
Blanche T. Holland, Respondent, v. Fred A. Reed et al., Appellants
191 N.Y. 543·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Blanche T. Holland, Respondent, v. Fred A. Reed et al., Appellants.
Holland v. Reed, 117 App. Div. 908, affirmed.
(Argued March 3, 1908;
decided March 31, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 31, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of ¡plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover from the defendants as innkeepers damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff through the destruction of personal property by fire while in defendants’ hotel.
Henderson Peck, Frank S. Black and Albert R. Hager for appellants.
Bernard G. Heyn and George B. Covington for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann; Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.