Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McReynolds et al. v. Christenberry, Postmaster of New York City, et al., 1965 — 379 U.S. 972 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
McReynolds et al. v. Christenberry, Postmaster of New York City, et al.
379 U.S. 972·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the case, set down for oral argument immediately following Lamont V. Postmaster General, No. 491. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 605.
McReynolds et al. v. Christenberry, Postmaster of New York City, et al.
Nanette Dembitz and Melvin L. Wulf for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the case, set down for oral argument immediately following Lamont V. Postmaster General, No. 491. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.