Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clarence Delafield, Respondent and Appellant, v. The Village of Westfield, Appellant and Respondent, 1901 — 169 N.Y. 582 · caselaw · US
General
Clarence Delafield, Respondent and Appellant, v. The Village of Westfield, Appellant and Respondent
169 N.Y. 582·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clarence Delafield, Respondent and Appellant, v. The Village of Westfield, Appellant and Respondent.
Delafield v. Village of Westfield, 41 App. Div. 24, affirmed.
(Argued December 3, 1901;
decided December 20, 1901.)
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 10, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee:
Frank W. Stevens for defendant, appellant and respondent.
David McGlure for plaintiff, respondent and appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Cray, Bartlett, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ, Not voting, Martin, J,