Tax
Archibald K. M. Ainslie et al., Respondents, v. Elias Peter Hicks et al., Defendants. Eugene A. Hoffman, as Assignee, Appellant
153 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Archibald K. M. Ainslie et al., Respondents, v. Elias Peter Hicks et al., Defendants. Eugene A. Hoffman, as Assignee, Appellant.
Ainslie v. Hicks, 13 App. Div. 888, affirmed.
(Argued April 19, 1897;
decided May 4, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 19, 1897, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for an order directing a referee to pay certain taxes from the purchase money received by him from a sale in an action of partition.
Charles LI. Stoddard and J. Van Veehten Oleott for appellant.
Albert G. McDonald for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.