General
Frederick Goll, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company Appellant
125 N.Y. 714·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
■ All concur, except Earl, Peckham and Gray, JJ„, not voting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick Goll, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company Appellant.
(Argued December 15, 1890;
decided January 13, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered opon an order made' April 2, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Brainard Tolies for appellant.
B. F. Watson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
■ All concur, except Earl, Peckham and Gray, JJ„, not voting.
Judgment affirmed.