Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
First National Bank of Marietta, Pa., Respondent, v. The Bushwick Chemical Works, Appellant, 1890 — 119 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
First National Bank of Marietta, Pa., Respondent, v. The Bushwick Chemical Works, Appellant
119 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
First National Bank of Marietta, Pa., Respondent, v. The Bushwick Chemical Works, Appellant.
(Submitted February 84, 1880;
decided March 11, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made July 15, 1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate an attachment.
Edward B. Whitney for appellant.
C. Bainbridge Smith for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.