Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Watts v. Indiana, 1949 — 336 U.S. 917 · caselaw · US
General
Watts v. Indiana
336 U.S. 917·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 344, Misc.
Watts v. Indiana.
Thurgood Marshall, Franklin H. Williams and Henry J. Richardson for petitioner. J. Emmett McMan amon, Attorney General of Indiana, Frank E. Coughlin, Deputy Attorney General, and Earl R. Cox for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana granted and case ordered transferred to the appellate docket. The stay order of January 31, 1949, is continued and it is ordered that execution of the sentence of death be stayed pending the final disposition of this case by this Court.