General
Richard Sandiford, Appellant, v. The Town of Hempstead, Respondent, and Carman Frost et al., Appellants
186 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard Sandiford, Appellant, v. The Town of Hempstead, Respondent, and Carman Frost et al., Appellants.
Sandiford v. Town of Hempstead, 97 App. Div. 163, affirmed.
(Argued October 5, 1906;
decided October 26, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 10, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant Town of Hempstead entered upon the report of a referee in an action to establish the title of the appellants herein to certain premises and to land under water of Hempstead bay.
Richard Sandiford, in person, W. Martin Jones, Jr., and Charles L. Vandewater for appellants.
Edward E. Sprague and Fred Ingraham for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch, J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.