Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Leander Fitts, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Nelson Beardsley, Impleaded, etc., Appellant; Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant, 1891 — 126 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
Leander Fitts, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Nelson Beardsley, Impleaded, etc., Appellant; Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant
126 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Leander Fitts, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Nelson Beardsley, Impleaded, etc., Appellant. Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant.
(Argued March 11, 1891;
decided April 14, 1891.)
Appeals from judgments of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon orders made October 1, 1889, which modified, and affirmed as modified, judgments in favor of plaintiff entered upon decisions of the court on trial at Special Term.
John I). Teller for appellant.
II. Y. Ilowla/nd and Sereno Ft Bayne for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgments affirmed.