General
BARRIOS et al. v. FLORIDA
384 U.S. 208·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BARRIOS et al. v. FLORIDA.
No. 722.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, Tobias Simon and Michael B. Standard for appellants.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Edward D. Coioart, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed.
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.