Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joacquin F. de Vignier et al., Petitioners, v. The City of New Orleans, 1906 — 200 U.S. 617 · caselaw · US
General
Joacquin F. de Vignier et al., Petitioners, v. The City of New Orleans
200 U.S. 617·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 523.
Joacquin F. de Vignier et al., Petitioners, v. The City of New Orleans.
January 8, 1906.
(Mr. Justice White took no part in the disposition of this application.) Mr. Richard DeGray, Mr. John D. Rouse,and Mr. William Grant for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.