General
Jost v. United States
347 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 1, 1954.
No. 468.
Jost v. United States.
Dean Acheson, W. Graham Clay tor, Jr., Charles A. Horsky, A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioner.
Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg filed a memorandum for the United States, confessing error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the District Court of Appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded with instructions to proceed not inconsistent with the findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommendations of the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, on confession of error by the Government.