General
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Intervening Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES
7 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Intervening Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth from the District Court of the United States Circuit.
May 14, 1925.)
No. 4271.
Appeal for the Northern District of Ohio; John M. Killits, Judge.
D. J. O’Rourke, of Toledo, Ohio, for appellant; A. E. Bernsteen, U. S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree of the District Court reversed, on the authority of the opinion filed April 6, 1925, in the case of Commercial Credit Company v. United States (No. 4241) 5 F. (2d) 1.