Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Howard J. Forker, as Receiver of the Rochester and Pittsburgh Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Walston H. Brown et al., Respondents, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 540 · caselaw · US
General
Howard J. Forker, as Receiver of the Rochester and Pittsburgh Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Walston H. Brown et al., Respondents
159 N.Y. 540·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Howard J. Forker, as Receiver of the Rochester and Pittsburgh Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Walston H. Brown et al., Respondents.
Forker v. Brown, 10 Misc. Rep. 161, affirmed.
(Argued April 25, 1899;
decided May 12, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the late Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered November 6, 1894, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision o-f the court on trial at Special Term.
.8. W. Rosendale and William, Sto'auss for appellant.
Wheeler H. Peckham for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.