General
ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC. v. COUNTY OF NASSAU et al.
385 U.S. 453·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC. v. COUNTY OF NASSAU et al.
No. 732.
Decided January 9, 1967.
George Morton Levy for appellant.
Morris H. Schneider for the County of Nassau et al.; Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of New York, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.