Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Secretary of Agriculture v. United States et al.; and Utah Poultry & Farmers Cooperative et al. v. United States et al., 1954 — 348 U.S. 807 · caselaw · US
General
Secretary of Agriculture v. United States et al.; and Utah Poultry & Farmers Cooperative et al. v. United States et al.
348 U.S. 807·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 171 and 282.
Nos. 172 and 283.
Secretary of Agriculture v. United States et al.; and Utah Poultry & Farmers Cooperative et al. v. United States et al.
Robert L. Farrington and Neil Brooks for the Secretary of Agriculture.
John H. Pratt for the Utah Poultry & Farmers Cooperative, Arthur C. O’Meara and John P. Staley for Swift & Co., appellants in Nos. 172 and 283, and Paul E. Blanchard (in No. 172) and Marcus Whiting (in No. 283) for Armour & Co., appellant.
Edward M. Reidy and Allen Crenshaw for the Interstate Commerce Commission; and Bryan P. Leverich, J. Edgar McDonald and William F. Zearfaus for the Intervening Railroads, appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Reported below: 119 F. Supp. 846.