Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The City of Syracuse, Appellant, v. Charles Hubbard et al., Respondents, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 668 · caselaw · US
General
The City of Syracuse, Appellant, v. Charles Hubbard et al., Respondents
168 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The City of Syracuse, Appellant, v. Charles Hubbard et al., Respondents.
City of Syracuse v. Hubbard, 64 App. Div. 587, appeal dismissed.
(Argued November 12, 1901;
decided November 19, 1901.)
Appeal 'from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 18, 1901, which affirmed an order of Special Term vacating a temporary injunction.
J. -/S'. Thorn and M. Z. Haven for appellant.
Alexander H. Cowie for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landón, JJ.