Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hupman v. United States, 1958 — 355 U.S. 949 · caselaw · US
General
Hupman v. United States
355 U.S. 949·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 764,
October Term, 1954.
Hupman v. United States.
Frank J. Donner, Arthur Kinoy and Marshall Perlin for movant-petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin filed a memorandum for the United States in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
The motion to vacate orders denying petition for writ of certiorari, 349 U. S. 953, and petition for rehearing, 350 U. S. 855, is denied.