Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daniel Goldschmidt, Respondent, v. Claude Chaffanjon, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1883 — 93 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
General
Daniel Goldschmidt, Respondent, v. Claude Chaffanjon, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
93 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel Goldschmidt, Respondent, v. Claude Chaffanjon, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Submitted October 11, 1883 ;
decided October 26, 1883.)
Louis Mathot for appellant.
William G. Wilson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.