Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George E. Gilmartin, Respondent, v. Andrew B. Buchanan et al., Appellants, 1907 — 190 N.Y. 521 · caselaw · US
General
George E. Gilmartin, Respondent, v. Andrew B. Buchanan et al., Appellants
190 N.Y. 521·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George E. Gilmartin, Respondent, v. Andrew B. Buchanan et al., Appellants.
Gilmartin v. Buchanan, 121 App. Div. 918, appeal dismissed.
(Argued November 18, 1907;
decided November 26, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 24, 1907, which affirmed an order of the court at a Trial Term denying a motion to set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and for a new trial.
The motion ivas made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to review the order appealed from.
Dwight 8. Ilerriek for motion.
Mathew JBushnell opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.