Corporations
E-LYNXX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. INNERWORKINGS, INC., Cirqit.Com, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
592 F. App'x 947·United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·2015
PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
E-LYNXX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. INNERWORKINGS, INC., Cirqit.Com, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 2014-1349.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 9, 2015.
Darren Patrick Nicholson, Sayles Werb-ner, P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Mark Strachan; Jonathan Tad Suder, Brett Michael Pinkus, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX.
Daryl Joseffer, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee InnerWorkings, Inc. Also represented by Adam Conrad, Charlotte, NC; Jennifer H. Doan, Joshua R. Thane, Hal-tom & Doan, Texarkana, TX.
Jennifer E. Hoekel, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO, for defendant-appel-lee Cirqit.com, Inc. Also represented by Jessica Mendez, Richard L. Brophy.
PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This Cause having been heard and considered, it is
Ordered And Adjudged:
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.