Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Galen L. TAIT, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Maryland, Plaintiff in Error, v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT COMPANY, Defendant in Error, 1925 — 7 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
Tax
Galen L. TAIT, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Maryland, Plaintiff in Error, v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT COMPANY, Defendant in Error
7 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Galen L. TAIT, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Maryland, Plaintiff in Error, v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT COMPANY, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
October 22, 1925.)
No. 2363.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Morris A. Soper, Judge.
A. W. W. Woodcock, U. S. Atty., of Baltimore, Md., and Charles T. Hendler, Sp. Atty. Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. O. (A. W. Gregg, Solicitor of Internal Revenue, of Washington D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff in error. M. H. Lauchheimer, of Baltimore, Md. (Slyvan Hayes Lauchheimer, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before WOODS, WADDILL, and ROSE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed upon the opinion below 2 F.(2d) 862.
Judge WOODS, before his death, concurred that this case should be affirmed.