Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Howe's Cave Association, Appellant, v. Peter Houck, Respondent, 1894 — 141 N.Y. 606 · caselaw · US
General
The Howe's Cave Association, Appellant, v. Peter Houck, Respondent
141 N.Y. 606·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Howe’s Cave Association, Appellant, v. Peter Houck, Respondent.
(Argued March 5, 1894;
decided March 20, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made September 13, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit without a jury.
William G. Lamont for appellant.
Gr. M. Palmer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Earl, J., not voting. Judgment affirmed.
66 Hun, 205.