Contracts · MBE-tested
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
329 U.S. 761·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 275.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
October 21, 1946.
Ira Lloyd Letts, John S. L. Yost, E. H. Lange and Russell Voertman for petitioner. Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett, Abraham J. Harris, Lambert McAllister and Melvin Richter for the Federal Power Commission, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.