Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Pink, Superintendent of Insurance, et al., 1941 — 313 U.S. 553 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Pink, Superintendent of Insurance, et al.
313 U.S. 553·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Murphy took no. part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 903.
United States v. Pink, Superintendent of Insurance, et al.
May 5, 1941.
Solicitor General Biddle for the United'States.' Mr. John M. Downes' for respondents. Mr. Albert G. Avery filed a brief on behalf Of Frederick H. Cattley et al., as amid curiae, ih support of respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New. York granted.
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Murphy took no. part in the consideration and decision of this application.