General
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Louise Alexander, Administratrix, etc.
239 U.S. 635·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 148.
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Louise Alexander, Administratrix, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin.
Argued January 6 and 7, 1916.
Decided January 10, 1916.
Mr. William A. Hayes for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. D. W. McNamara and Miss Anna B. Hull for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; (2) Missouri Pacific R. R. v. Humes, 115 U. S. 512; Minnesota & St. L. R. R. v. Beckwith, 129 U. S. 26; Minnesota & St. L. R. R. v. Emmons, 149 U. S. 364; (3) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112, 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31.