Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MALJAMAR OIL and GAS CORPORATION v. Tom SMITH, 1931 — 49 F.2d 1081 · caselaw · US
Corporations
MALJAMAR OIL and GAS CORPORATION v. Tom SMITH
49 F.2d 1081·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MALJAMAR OIL and GAS CORPORATION v. Tom SMITH.
No. 330.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
March 9, 1931.
J. D. Atwood, of Roswell, N. M., for appellant.
Caswell S. Neal,"of Carlsbad, N. M., for appellee.
Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed March 9,1931, per stipulation, at costs of appellant.