Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co. et al.; Barr v. Matteo et al.; Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission; Palermo v. United States; Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States; United States et al. v. Hine Pontiac et al.; United States v. Colonial Chevrolet Corp. et al.; Anderson et al. v. United States; Woolfson v. Doyle, Trustee in Reorganization, et al.; Zeddies v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Embry Brothers, Inc., et al. v. Davis et al.; Walker v. Washington et al.; Cage v. Texas; Ginsburg v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York; Marchese v. United States; Hershey Mfg. Co. v. Adamowski et al.; United States Steel Corp. v. Giguere; Kasper v. United States, 1959 — 361 U.S. 854 · caselaw · US