Torts · MBE-tested
Max LEIBOWITZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
22 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max LEIBOWITZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
November 12, 1927.
No. 3676.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; Wm. N. Runyon, Judge.
Irving Siegler, of Newark, N. J., for appellant.
Walter G. Winne, U. S. Dist. Atty., of Hackensack, N. J., and Harlan Besson, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Hoboken, N. J.,
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This is an. appeal from a decree that certain premises were a nuisance, as defined by section 21, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 33), and ordering their closure. No principle of law is involved, and the only question is one of fact. As we feel, after á study of the proofs, that the findings by the judge, who had the witnesses before him, were correct, we limit, ourselves to so stating, and affirm the decree.