General
John Ferguson, Appellant, v. Toledo, Ann Arbor and North Michigan Railroad Company, Defendant, and Ann Arbor Railroad Company, Respondent
183 N.Y. 557·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Ferguson, Appellant, v. Toledo, Ann Arbor and North Michigan Railroad Company, Defendant, and Ann Arbor Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued December 11, 1905;
decided January 9, 1906.)
Ferguson v. Toledo, A. A. & N. M. R. R. Co., 85 App. Div. 352, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 24, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant respondent entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
John M. Bower for appellant.
Howard Mansfield and Herbert C. Lakin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.