Tax
Dromey, Administrator v. Wisconsin Tax Commission et al.
304 U.S. 548·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 997.
Dromey, Administrator v. Wisconsin Tax Commission et al.
Decided May 23, 1938.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Morris v. Alabama, 302 U. S. 642; (2) Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U. S. 276, 279-281; New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 U. S. 308, 313; Mitchell v. United States, 21 Wall. 350, 353.
Mr. S. W. Jensch for appellant.
Mr. Joseph E. Messerschmidt for respondents.